Difference between revisions of "RUN 134 TP Efficiency"

From BESIII Ferrara Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "RUN: 134 SUBRUN: 0 ./bin/event 134 0 Number of entries: 536639 TIGER chip 0 efficiency: 0.967265 and time efficiency: 0.933533 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967265 TI...")
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
RUN: 134
+
Data analyzed after the event generation. The analysis macro is written in $TER/src/event.C
SUBRUN: 0
+
 
./bin/event 134 0
+
88 chip analyzed and it turns out that the TP from some chip does not reach the end of the readout chain, in details:
Number of entries: 536639
+
 
TIGER chip 0 efficiency: 0.967265 and time efficiency: 0.933533 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967265
+
{| class="wikitable"
TIGER chip 1 efficiency: 0.969259 and time efficiency: 0.790628 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.966268
+
|+
TIGER chip 2 efficiency: 0.912928 and time efficiency: 0.879694 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.912928
+
!Chip
TIGER chip 3 efficiency: 0.0586574 and time efficiency: 0.056497 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.0586574
+
!Efficiency
TIGER chip 4 efficiency: 0.944666 and time efficiency: 0.910602 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.944666
+
!Note
TIGER chip 5 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0        and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
+
|-
TIGER chip 6 efficiency: 0.960784 and time efficiency: 0.926221 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.960784
+
|3
TIGER chip 7 efficiency: 0.970921 and time efficiency: 0.015453 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.951645
+
|5%
TIGER chip 8 efficiency: 0.969924 and time efficiency: 0.952642 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.969924
+
| blocked between ana and event (unknown)
TIGER chip 9 efficiency: 0.968594 and time efficiency: 0.951313 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968594
+
|-
TIGER chip 10 efficiency: 0.967763 and time efficiency: 0.950316 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967763
+
|5
TIGER chip 11 efficiency: 0.964772 and time efficiency: 0.947325 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.964772
+
|0%
TIGER chip 12 efficiency: 0.968594 and time efficiency: 0.951147 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968594
+
|TFINE = 1008 always -> rejected in ana.C
TIGER chip 13 efficiency: 0.968262 and time efficiency: 0.950648 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968262
+
|-
TIGER chip 14 efficiency: 0.961947 and time efficiency: 0.944666 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.961947
+
|15
TIGER chip 15 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0        and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
+
|0%
TIGER chip 16 efficiency: 0.970754 and time efficiency: 0.970588 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.970754
+
|does not see TP (known)
TIGER chip 17 efficiency: 0.68777         and time efficiency: 0.686607 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.686773
+
|-
TIGER chip 18 efficiency: 0.972582 and time efficiency: 0.972416 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.972582
+
|17
TIGER chip 19 efficiency: 0.962612 and time efficiency: 0.962446 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.962612
+
|70%
TIGER chip 20 efficiency: 0.967265 and time efficiency: 0.959123 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.959123
+
|TD problem
TIGER chip 21 efficiency: 0.967597 and time efficiency: 0.958956 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.958956
+
|-
TIGER chip 22 efficiency: 0.966268 and time efficiency: 0.957627 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.957627
+
|40
TIGER chip 23 efficiency: 0.969093 and time efficiency: 0.960286 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.960286
+
|3%
TIGER chip 24 efficiency: 0.97225         and time efficiency: 0.949153 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.971751
+
|does not see TP
TIGER chip 25 efficiency: 0.965769 and time efficiency: 0.943669 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965769
+
|-
TIGER chip 26 efficiency: 0.97009         and time efficiency: 0.947491 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.97009
+
|44,45
TIGER chip 27 efficiency: 0.964939 and time efficiency: 0.94234 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.964939
+
|7%
TIGER chip 28 efficiency: 0.965437 and time efficiency: 0.94317 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965437
+
|8/10 bit error
TIGER chip 29 efficiency: 0.96444         and time efficiency: 0.941841 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.96444
+
|-
TIGER chip 30 efficiency: 0.957627 and time efficiency: 0.933367 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.957627
+
|70
TIGER chip 31 efficiency: 0.971087 and time efficiency: 0.0422067 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.971087
+
|0%
TIGER chip 32 efficiency: 0.962944 and time efficiency: 0.944167 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.962944
+
|does not see TP (known)
TIGER chip 33 efficiency: 0.962944 and time efficiency: 0.944167 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.962944
+
|-
TIGER chip 34 efficiency: 0.967763 and time efficiency: 0.948986 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967763
+
|82,83,86,87
TIGER chip 35 efficiency: 0.968594 and time efficiency: 0.948322 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968594
+
|0%
TIGER chip 36 efficiency: 0.960618 and time efficiency: 0.941841 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.960618
+
|8/10 bit error ??
TIGER chip 37 efficiency: 0.95879         and time efficiency: 0.922566 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.95879
+
|}
TIGER chip 38 efficiency: 0.965105 and time efficiency: 0.94666 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965105
+
 
TIGER chip 39 efficiency: 0.926388 and time efficiency: 0.828182 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.926388
+
The others TP shows an efficiency above 95%. Where the efficiency is measured as:  
TIGER chip 40 efficiency: 0.0257561 and time efficiency: 0.0219342 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.0257561
+
 
TIGER chip 41 efficiency: 0.566633 and time efficiency: 0.51429 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.566633
+
chip_efficiency = # events with 1 TP on that chip / # total event with at least 1 TP
TIGER chip 42 efficiency: 0.963111 and time efficiency: 0.877202 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963111
+
 
TIGER chip 43 efficiency: 0.966268 and time efficiency: 0.880193 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.966268
+
A TP reference for each Layer has been measured as the mode of the TP of the layer.
TIGER chip 44 efficiency: 0.0619807 and time efficiency: 0.0550017 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.0619807
+
 
TIGER chip 45 efficiency: 0.0633101 and time efficiency: 0.0558325 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.0633101
+
The time difference between this time has been measured for each TP of the Layer and it is shown that the time efficiency (TP_Chip_i = TP_Layer) is 85-95%. If we consider at least 1 clock discrepancy (TP_Chip_i = TP_Layer +- 1 clock) then the time efficiency goes above 95%
TIGER chip 46 efficiency: 0.96444         and time efficiency: 0.878365 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.96444
+
 
TIGER chip 47 efficiency: 0.968428 and time efficiency: 0.877534 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968428
+
Here are saved the results of the efficiency and time efficiency of each TP: [https://wiki.fe.infn.it/besiii/img_auth.php/0/09/TP_test_RUN134.txt]
TIGER chip 48 efficiency: 0.965271 and time efficiency: 0.886009 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965271
 
TIGER chip 49 efficiency: 0.967763 and time efficiency: 0.888169 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967763
 
TIGER chip 50 efficiency: 0.961449 and time efficiency: 0.882851 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.961449
 
TIGER chip 51 efficiency: 0.96444         and time efficiency: 0.885344 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.96444
 
TIGER chip 52 efficiency: 0.963111 and time efficiency: 0.884015 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963111
 
TIGER chip 53 efficiency: 0.963111 and time efficiency: 0.816883 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963111
 
TIGER chip 54 efficiency: 0.964772 and time efficiency: 0.886009 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.964772
 
TIGER chip 55 efficiency: 0.96876         and time efficiency: 0.0943835 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.96876
 
TIGER chip 56 efficiency: 0.100033 and time efficiency: 0.0988701 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.100033
 
TIGER chip 57 efficiency: 0.0998671 and time efficiency: 0.0987039 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.0998671
 
TIGER chip 58 efficiency: 0.967431 and time efficiency: 0.955799 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967431
 
TIGER chip 59 efficiency: 0.963111 and time efficiency: 0.951147 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963111
 
TIGER chip 60 efficiency: 0.967099 and time efficiency: 0.954802 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.966766
 
TIGER chip 61 efficiency: 0.968096 and time efficiency: 0.956298 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968096
 
TIGER chip 62 efficiency: 0.962446 and time efficiency: 0.950482 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.962446
 
TIGER chip 63 efficiency: 0.967265 and time efficiency: 0.954304 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967265
 
TIGER chip 64 efficiency: 0.970256 and time efficiency: 0.881522 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.970256
 
TIGER chip 65 efficiency: 0.965769 and time efficiency: 0.875374 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965769
 
TIGER chip 66 efficiency: 0.967431 and time efficiency: 0.879528 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.967431
 
TIGER chip 67 efficiency: 0.965437 and time efficiency: 0.876371 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965437
 
TIGER chip 68 efficiency: 0.963443 and time efficiency: 0.874211 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963443
 
TIGER chip 69 efficiency: 0.960452 and time efficiency: 0.872051 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.960452
 
TIGER chip 70 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
 
TIGER chip 71 efficiency: 0.964772 and time efficiency: 0.0536723 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.881854
 
TIGER chip 72 efficiency: 0.968428 and time efficiency: 0.934031 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968428
 
TIGER chip 73 efficiency: 0.962778 and time efficiency: 0.92888 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.962778
 
TIGER chip 74 efficiency: 0.965437 and time efficiency: 0.931539 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965437
 
TIGER chip 75 efficiency: 0.961283 and time efficiency: 0.927717 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.961283
 
TIGER chip 76 efficiency: 0.96012         and time efficiency: 0.926055 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.96012
 
TIGER chip 77 efficiency: 0.965603 and time efficiency: 0.931539 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965603
 
TIGER chip 78 efficiency: 0.968262 and time efficiency: 0.934031 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.968262
 
TIGER chip 79 efficiency: 0.969757 and time efficiency: 0.935527 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.969757
 
TIGER chip 80 efficiency: 0.963609 and time efficiency: 0.962944 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.963609
 
TIGER chip 81 efficiency: 0.965437 and time efficiency: 0.964606 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.965437
 
TIGER chip 82 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
 
TIGER chip 83 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
 
TIGER chip 84 efficiency: 0.966102 and time efficiency: 0.965271 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.966102
 
TIGER chip 85 efficiency: 0.961283 and time efficiency: 0.960452 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0.961283
 
TIGER chip 86 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
 
TIGER chip 87 efficiency: 0         and time efficiency: 0 and time efficiency +- 1 clock: 0
 

Latest revision as of 00:37, 26 June 2019

Data analyzed after the event generation. The analysis macro is written in $TER/src/event.C

88 chip analyzed and it turns out that the TP from some chip does not reach the end of the readout chain, in details:

Chip Efficiency Note
3 5% blocked between ana and event (unknown)
5 0% TFINE = 1008 always -> rejected in ana.C
15 0% does not see TP (known)
17 70% TD problem
40 3% does not see TP
44,45 7% 8/10 bit error
70 0% does not see TP (known)
82,83,86,87 0% 8/10 bit error ??

The others TP shows an efficiency above 95%. Where the efficiency is measured as:

chip_efficiency = # events with 1 TP on that chip / # total event with at least 1 TP

A TP reference for each Layer has been measured as the mode of the TP of the layer.

The time difference between this time has been measured for each TP of the Layer and it is shown that the time efficiency (TP_Chip_i = TP_Layer) is 85-95%. If we consider at least 1 clock discrepancy (TP_Chip_i = TP_Layer +- 1 clock) then the time efficiency goes above 95%

Here are saved the results of the efficiency and time efficiency of each TP: [1]